My Garmin Forerunner 935 has stayed on its charger since I got Apple Watch 3 LTE/4G

 Move over once? Move over twice?

Move over once? Move over twice?

So many athletes look at Apple Watch and disregard it as a serious training tool.  They are wrong - I've been using Series 3 LTE/4G for my IronMan winter training pretty much without issue, while my Garmin 935 has stayed on its charger.

I'm more than happy with Apple Watch for my training in these winter months.

Here's the things I hear and my responses - if I've missed any, put them in the comments and I'll respond!

What the naysayers say

Battery life doesn't cut it!

 My battery at 21:45 after wearing the Apple Watch series 3 LTE since 7:30am and doing 90mins on the turbo at lunch

My battery at 21:45 after wearing the Apple Watch series 3 LTE since 7:30am and doing 90mins on the turbo at lunch

This is the strongest argument against the Apple Watch for long distance events.  My tests so far have revealed a life of around 3.5 to 4hrs for workout tracking with LTE and GPS on; that's fine for short events and training of course.  However there are other options I need to try such as the low power mode combined with a bluetooth HR strap - I'll be testing this with a long bike ride of 4-6hrs as soon as I get a weekend that isn't packed with other stuff.  Using Apple Watch on a turbo where your phone is nearby and GPS is not needed, appears to not affect battery life in any significant way.  And overall for day to day training, battery life is great.  Yesterday I had the watch on all day, with a 30min turbo, forgot to charge it at night and in the morning had 30% left.


So more to come on battery life, and it is a limiter as it stands, and certainly won't last for my full IronMan next year without some creative charging on the bike (though for the event, my objectives for the tech are different to training, I really just want pace/power guidance with the timings provided by the timing chips from the event - not sure if that will make any difference yet - certainly I would like to see a Tri app that recognised the difference between training and events though)

Heart rate tracker is not accurate

This was a common complaint for earlier versions of watchOS and Series 2, but my tests so far with watchOS 4 and series 3 have been impressive.  

I have no concerns about the quality of the HR data.  Overall feedback from users of this blog have been encouraging too.  

One thing to consider is proper placement of the watch (see Apple's doc here - basically not too loose, not too tight), and I have wondered if the new Sports Loop offers superior performance because of a better fit, especially in the pool.  Lets just say that again - Apple Watch delivers quality HR in the pool - Apple have cracked this with their optical sensor and Watch and iPhone algorithms , whilst Garmin are still saying that the quality bar for wrist based sensors is too low and you need to use a chest strap - I think Garmin need to catch up here.

Apple Watch also provides all day HR monitoring.  Throughout the day you can get on your Watch your Current HR, your Resting HR, your Walking average, together with average stats for workouts, and details of HR recovery.  This is great and simply viewing your Resting HR can be a useful guide to your current health - mine jumped to around 56 recently for a few days as I had a cold, then fell back to my normal 49-52 when I had recovered.  Wouldn't it be great if an app took that into account and then adjusted your training for the day accordingly?

GPS track is poor

Pick any sports tracker and go to the support forum for it and you'll find large heated discussions about the quality of the GPS track.  

With current technology we are not going to get super accurate tracks all the time.  I've had mostly great results with my Garmin Forerunner 935, but my Fenix 3 before that made me look like a drunken swimmer occasionally, more zig zag than Box Hill in fact.  Apple Watch is on par with the 935 in my experience - so nothing to worry about here, please move on.

Hang on - don't go quite yet!  Just before you ask if you can see your GPS route on something other than the multicoloured map on your iPhone, please refer to the next section...

I can't export my data to my favourite platform (Strava, TP etc)

That was true, but this is now a solved problem.  See RunGap and HealthFit.

The Workout app is too basic - what about Intervals!

 Lots of third party apps available...

Lots of third party apps available...

I'm often surprised how the Apple Watch functionality is judged on the built in Workout app, and not the many third party apps that can be installed. But maybe I shouldn't be - it's the power of defaults, and most people prefer a simpler life if possible.  

The Workout app has improved in watchOS 4, now supporting multi-sport (to a degree - see this post), much better swim metrics and new workout types such as High Intensity Interval Training (note this is just a way of Apple Watch better recording HR during Intervals - nothing to do with creating a structured workout).

So the current Workout app is very good at what it does, but it does have limitations for triathletes and for structured training (well there isn't any structured training!).  I do have a post in the queue - everything you wanted to know about the Workout app, but were too overtrained too ask - coming soon, but in reality most triathlete's are going to be looking at other apps they can install.

And that brings me to third-party apps - there are many and more coming.  I am developing my review approach for these but essentially I will be reviewing all those that meet the following criteria:

  • They are sports tracking apps (doh!)
  • The can track on Apple Watch without the need for iPhone being around. 
  • They read and write data to the Apple Health database.

Ideally I'd like to see apps that don't need iPhone or a web platform at all - that is getting more feasible with series 3 LTE/4G, but let's not limit our thinking here - Apple will not be letting up on the yearly progress they are making with Apple Watch (I for one am surprised we already have LTE in both 42mm and 38mm watches and a bunch of other functionality without battery life loss over series 2 - really, that's quite remarkable!), and just think what they may be doing in another three years.

What about my ANT+ power meters? Am I supposed to throw them away?

There are ways to bridge ANT+ devices to bluetooth.  You can use the 4iiii HR strap or the CABLE from npe for example.  What both of these do is pick up the ANT+ broadcast and then turn it into a bluetooth signal that your Apple Watch can receive.  That's great, but since the Apple Workout app doesn't look for data from other sensors, you will need a third party app to view and log it.  Many iPhone apps already do this (such as iSmoothRun) but we are waiting for Series 3 Watch apps that don't need iPhone to be around to offer it.  They're coming though, and iSmoothRun have said they are adding it this year.

Here's an interesting story - I've been using Garmin Vectors since the first release for power on the bike.  Last week they stopped broadcasting anything at all, and after checking batteries etc, I contacted Garmin support.  Their answer?  Buy the Vector to Vector 2 upgrade kit.  hmmm.  (I actually tried that, and had other issues but that's another story).  So I am now selling those, and taking the opportunity to get a power meter that supports BLE as wells as ANT+ - I've ended up with PowerTap P1s (for now, I'll most likely upgrade to the right pedal when it is available too).  The thing is, I expect all new devices to support BLE and ANT+ in the future, and I don't feel like I've lost much - perhaps some extra dynamics from Garmin that I didn't really use  (Garmin have opened up cycling dynamics to other companies but it's ANT+ only as I understand it) 

So here are your options:

  1. Use an ANT+ to BLE bridge and get a Watch app (when available) that can read the data 
  2. Change your power meters to ones that support BLE and get a Watch app (when available) that can read the data
  3. Do either of the above and use an iPhone app that supports the data now and take iPhone with you.
  4. Stick with a bike computer for now like the Elemnt Bolt - I know this is a bit of a cop out but a bike computer is preferable for visibility and route planning than a wrist worn device.  Keep your Apple Watch on and log an outdoor ride as a backup.  Unfortunately there is no way to broadcast HR from Apple Watch to another device, so you'll have to wear a BLE HR band if you want that recorded on your bike computer.

Small hint on mounting your Apple Watch on your bike if you want to do that.  There are a few mounts in kickstarters or on Amazon such as and this one, but I have one of these which seems to work OK.  Bear in mind you'll have lost optical HR, so you'll need to wear a separate BLE one and connect it to Apple Watch, and unless you want to keep tapping in your passcode as you ride you'll want to turn your passcode off (which will also remove any cards you have for Apple Pay, which is a bit of a pain).  

UPDATE: As mentioned in comments If you turn  off Wrist Detection in Settings > Passcode on the watch or the iPhone Watch app, then you don’t need to turn off the passcode at all. So you can mount the watch on the bike, tap the passcode in once if needed, use a BT HR strap and then cycle.  You will need to tap the screen to view the display but you won’t need to enter a passcode.  You can increase the time the screen stays on after a tap to 70secs from 15secs in a Settings > General > Wake Screen which gives you more time to look at it. Make sure you turn Wrist detection back on after a ride especially if you use Apple Pay.

Screen doesn't stay on, and I don't want a touch screen for running

That's correct, it doesn't stay on, but it does turn on when you look at it - this works 99% of the time for me (that's an estimate, but really it hasn't been a problem).  


The touch screen has caused me an issue when I was running with a long sleeve waterproof on in fairly heavy rain.  The end of the sleeve which was wet, actually paused the run somehow twice in a single run. No worries - you can lock the screen instead and use the Digital Crown and Side Button pressed together to pause the run if needed (or use AutoPause).  With the screen locked you do lose the ability to record a "segment" as Apple call it - or lap as the rest of us do.  Normally you do this by double-tapping on the screen, and it will show your segment time, both live and in the summary data at the end, but it does nothing with the screen locked (as you'd expect)

To lock the screen, swipe right and tap the water drop (this is primarily a swimming option).

To unlock, scroll the digital crown until the watch starts beeping (this is to dispel water from the speaker, if you are not bothered about this, just cover the watch with your hand to stop the beeping)

Have I missed anything?

Let me know in the comments and I'll respond!